Garmin Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, 9 January 2010

Posted on 16:39 by Unknown
A Legal Perspective on Inter-Personal Relationships

Often, when things go wrong between colleagues, friends, or family, one party says to the other, "I'm so sorry, but, I didn't mean it. You know I didn't mean to do it. Right? It was an accident!"

This statement is a plea for forgiveness, and a hope that all will return to normalcy.

In US common civil law, this statement would be a defense against intentional misconduct. But, it would be useless against a claim of gross negligence and negligence.

Gross Negligence is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both.

Negligence, rather, is a mere failure to exercise reasonable care.

In our inter-personal relationships, I fear we are often too binary -- looking for intentional harm or assuming that without intention, the non-harmed party must be innocent.

But if we adopt the US common civil law standard, if we are careless with those we should be caring for, then we are responsible for the harm we cause them by our carelessness.

And, if (for whatever reason) we consciously and voluntarily disregard the need to use reasonable care in our relationships (for example, when the other party has asked us to pay attention to something that hurts them and we choose not to pay attention to it in our treatment of them), then we are grossly negligent, and we are even more culpable for their harm than if we just failed to exercise reasonable care.

If 2009 taught me anything, it was that I needed to stand up for myself when people (professionally, personally, and in the family) were harming me without intention. On accident.

They didn't mean it. They were not bad people. I love them.

But, at the end of the day, even if the other party doesn't mean it, if their actions harm you, they harm you. And, we all have a duty to avoid negligence (and gross negligence) when it comes to care of ourselves.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in balance, lawyering | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Economy Hosting just Rs. 109/month for 12 months!

Popular Posts

  • Happy Friday
    We had friends over for Mandarin night last night and I was able to catch up with L and G.  It felt like I hadn't seen and caught up w...
  • (no title)
    Brrrr..... Beautiful Grand Teton National Park (yes, the French Trappers named it after tatas) is the only national park with an airport in ...
  • (no title)
    Aspirations I recently finished Eat, Love, Pray . I haven't identified that much with a literary voice in a very long time. It was a t...
  • (no title)
    Round-up That was always the yuppie dream: an aristocratic life achieved meritocratically. True dat. For more on this topic, and the curren...
  • Chrystal Springs Trail Run
    Today's Chrystal Springs Trail Run was great.   Such a great local trail run up and down a (small) mountain.  Well run.  Good weather. ...
  • Last Week's Version of Success
    I am just not that hard on myself.  It's true.  When I fall short of my goals, rather than beating myself up, I generally look at how fa...
  • (no title)
    Need to Evolve Tonight, while catching up on facebook with some very long lost friends, I encountered this response: add\n*Jenn* Seriously. ...
  • (no title)
    Back in Lawyer Land 18.5 hour work-day. Yeah, I vaguely remember this... Good night.
  • (no title)
    Today's Feminism I attended an event today that was targeted to successful women in the area of my legal practice. Many interesting sto...
  • Goals: The Signposts of Life
    How is it already October? Also, what is going on with the weather? Everything feels like it is moving entirely too fast for me.  Like I can...

Categories

  • balance
  • Bar Exam
  • books
  • driving
  • economics
  • family
  • food
  • garden
  • home
  • language
  • law school
  • lawyering
  • privacy
  • questions
  • recipe
  • restaurants
  • run
  • running
  • tech
  • tomatoes
  • Tortoise
  • travel
  • wine
  • words
  • yoga

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (76)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2012 (124)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2011 (94)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ▼  2010 (96)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ▼  January (8)
      • Winter, Food, and GardenA while back, there were o...
      • Red Lentil SaladMMM... winter comfort food. Enjoy...
      • Right to Forget?It appears that France is consider...
      • A Legal Perspective on Inter-Personal Relationship...
      • De-Anonymization Warning #2A while back, I hinted ...
      • 2009: The year in booksWell, here we are again -- ...
      • I am allergicTo dogs.To everything with fur, reall...
      • Happy New Year!My plan was to drop brother at a pa...
  • ►  2009 (110)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile